Eric Swanson wrote:
I think there's no doubt
that the public often sees only the massive PR campaign by the
denialist, instead of the scientific problems. The problem is a very
big one and the groups with the most money to lose are likely to
respond with the loudest complaints. For better or worse, that's the
way our present political process functions.
Indeed, and that's the way it works for climate alarmists as well.
Does the public know how NASA has manipulated surface temperature data
that biases conclusion toward warming? Does the public know about the
IPCC misuse of glacial retreat data? Are insurance companies and carbon
trading lobbyists touting these very real aspects of AGW as well?
The hill slopes both ways.
Hayduke
--
Hayduke Blogs
http://hayduke2000.blogspot.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
