Jerry Feldman <g...@blu.org> writes:
>
> The issue with C++ (and other OO languages) is that it is important that
> you think in OO.
Stroustrup and Stepanov both disagree with this, .cf.:
http://www2.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#Object-Oriented-language
http://www.stlport.org/resources/StepanovUSA.html
http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/drdobbs-interview.html
However, I'd agree that one had better be able to deal with the OO
stuff if one expects to be able to handle anyone else's C++ code--
mainly because the misconception is so widespread.
--
"Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr))))."
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
