OK. Last time I tried this (about 20 years ago), I was told a "signature pool" could not be done. (Although I was new to how corporations worked, and they may not have understood what I wanted.)
Its nice to know GNHLUG's bank can work with signature pools. --Bruce Shawn K. O'Shea wrote: > At least what I believe was our consensus at the last Board meeting > was 3 people on the signing card (people allowed to sign for the > account) and checks requiring two signatures. For SCOSUG we did > something similar, except I think we allowed one signature for a check > (but we had three people on the signing card filed with the bank). > > -Shawn > > On 10/21/07, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hmmm. Do you want 2 or 3 signatories to sign the check - otherwise Ben >> will make this decision on his own. And if its 2 signatories, you need >> to pick which two. >> >> --Bruce >> >> Ted Roche wrote: >> >>> Ben Scott wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Okay, it appears I misunderstood the phone rep. There's no form to >>>> fill out; that's done electronically, on-the-spot. What I could have >>>> picked up are the signature cards for the designated signatories. >>>> Since I wasn't sure who we wanted to designate, I left without >>>> starting that process. >>>> >>>> So the next big question is: Who do we want to be the signatories? >>>> Just the President (Ted Roche), Secretary (Bill Sconce), and Treasurer >>>> (myself)? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I think that was our understanding, and it ought to work as a start we >>> can alter later. Do you need any info from us? >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> gnhlug-org mailing list >> gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org >> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/ >> >> _______________________________________________ gnhlug-org mailing list gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/
