If you can include .64 and .95, the address/netmask would be
206.84.220.64/255.255.255.224.
It was explained to me that the net mask must be a bitstring of contiguous
'1's followed by a bitstring of contiguous '0's (starting at the MSB).
Using that rule, there's no way to construct an address/mask for the range
.65-.94.
Jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, February 24, 2000 10:06 PM
Subject: tcp wrappers and net/mask
>It's been a while since I've done net/mask stuff. I want tcp wrappers to
>allow the following hosts:
>206.84.220.65 - 206.84.220.94
>
> 65 -> 0100 0001
> 94 -> 0101 1110
>----------------
> 95 -> 0101 1111
>160 -> 1010 0000
>
>206.84.220.160/255.255.255.95 ?
>
>
>
>**********************************************************
>To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
>*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
>unsubscribe gnhlug
>**********************************************************
>
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
