>206.84.220.64/255.255.255.224.
>It was explained to me that the net mask must be a bitstring of contiguous
>'1's followed by a bitstring of contiguous '0's (starting at the MSB).
>Using that rule, there's no way to construct an address/mask for the range
>.65-.94.
I'm still not sure about this, although I haven't tried it yet... Could you
please give it a try and tell us about the result? I am really wondering about
this because I read somewhere that it is possible.
Ferenc
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
