Quoting Niall Kavanagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Jeffry Smith wrote:
> > about KDE). Also, Gnome doesn't have the licensing conflicts that KDE
> > does (even the new Open Source QT).
> At the risk of starting a licensing flame war, can you detail where the
> open source QT license is lacking? Not a leading question I assure you! ;)
It's not that it's lacking at all. It's just that the QPL isn't compatible
with GPL. It's a sticky situtation, that probrably will not be solved anytime
soon. QT is indeed 'Free Software'. Nothing wrong with the licence at all.
---
Thomas Charron
<< Wanted: One decent sig >>
<< Preferably litle used >>
<< and stored in garage. ?>>
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
