On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Farrell Woods wrote:
> I was using Gnome/Enlightenment for a while, but recently switched ...
> o KDE runs much, much faster
> o its performance doesn't degrade [over time]
> o KDE's apps seem less prone to leaving core files kicking around
In the "stock" GNOME setups provided with most distros, I'd be inclined to
agree. However, with the more recent GNOME releases and the "new" "default"
GNOME window manager, Sawfish (formerly Sawmill), things are much improved.
Sawfish isn't the performance dog E! is, and most or all of the crashes and
other quirks earlier GNOME programs exhibited seem to have been fixed.
Don't get me wrong, KDE is a fine suite, and I'm really impressed with it,
but a lot of the deficiencies in GNOME have been fixed. Meanwhile, KDE 1.x
isn't as configurable as I'd like it to be. I must admit, KDE 2.x is looking
very interesting, though.
Just my two marks. :-)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| If someone made a television show about Adobe Photoshop, would they have |
| to warn viewers about the graphic nature of the program? |
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
