Just don't go with 2.4.11. Linus invalidated it. I think it was out for like 3 days and he just released 2.4.12. I guess there was a major boo boo with it. (so I heard on another mailing list I'm member of).
Paul W On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 02:05:54PM -0400, Paul Lussier wrote: > > In a message dated: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 11:31:24 EDT > Tom Rauschenbach said: > > >Since you're already at 2.4 I don't have anything to help you, but for people > >who are less agressive in upgrading, 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4 all have very > >different approaches to NAT and firewalling. Making a change in major > >revisions can be expensive. Having just got NAT working I'm really reluctant > >to go to 2.4. > > Yes, that's true, but keep in mind, you can, technically, run any of > them under 2.4. You don't *have* to switch. > > > ********************************************************** > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the > *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter: > unsubscribe gnhlug > ********************************************************** ********************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter: unsubscribe gnhlug **********************************************************
