On 26 Jun 2002, at 9:28am, Kevin D. Clark wrote: > The hardware *does not* run in the following way: > > again: > is the PC (program counter) at a breakpoint? if so, <break> > run the instruction at the PC > goto again;
That was actually my point. The OP complained about the debugger having to insert instructions into the code to implement breakpoints; I was trying to demonstrate that the alternative would be quite a bit worse. Sorry if I did not make that clear. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************
