On 06/06/2017 11:43 PM, Gautier de Montmollin wrote: > Could not agree more! But again, it is not my program.
Sure it is. It's your program, and part of its code is Gnoga. > Now, you cannot expect everybody not having to suppress checks at any > point in time. > Since Gnoga is meant to be a library for a broad usage (the 'o' in > "omnificent") and used by various people, it is better to make it > bullet-proof and work with different sets of GNAT options - even those > you don't like or, in this special case, make the RTL not compliant with > the Ada standard. > If you're using Gnoga, the time to talk to the browser will swamp everything else, so there's no reason to suppress checks. -- Jeff Carter "I wave my private parts at your aunties." Monty Python & the Holy Grail 13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gnoga-list mailing list Gnoga-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnoga-list
