On 06/07/2017 08:50 PM, Gautier de Montmollin wrote: > I did a few tests today on this interesting topic, with GNAT GPL 2016. > Just grabbing a part of my toolbox used in the real world, the zip-ada > compression with -ep2 option is 50% slower without -gnatp that with it > (all other options being the same) on a Xeon PC. > Another program, an intensive-FPU number-crunching software with large > arrays, used at work, is actually 2% *faster* without -gnatp than with > it, on the Xeon machine; and arond 1% *faster* on a laptop (CPU unknown). > So with some testing I get a [-50% , +2%] range depending on the > applications...
If you wrote code that is 50% checks that is an amazing achievement. -- Jeff Carter "My brain hurts!" Monty Python's Flying Circus 21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gnoga-list mailing list Gnoga-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnoga-list
