Thanks for making this clear then. On Mon, Nov 9, 2015, 1:49 AM Aron Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > As I've said previously please be patient. You need to have quite some > accepted translations before becoming a reviewer. The problem we don't have > enough active reviewer was caused by not having enough people doing long > term commitment, and cannot be solved in a way of compromising quality. > > We do have problems that existing reviewers and committers are not being > active enough to keep up with current submissions, but it's not something > we are able to solve by simply accepting more people as reviewer instantly. > > Regards, > Aron > > > > On Nov 9, 2015, at 11:25, Mingcong Bai <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > For the proposal, if there is to be more reviewers being put in place, I > am willing to apply > for a position as a reviewer. > > In addition, in my humble opinion, the fact that GNOME being a widely used > desktop > environment, lacking adequate zh_CN localization support (or the fact that > it is just slacking > behind the release cycles...) is painful and sorry to look at, I do think > it is now the time for > a more progressive and a (hopefully) more efficient > translate-review-commit to be put > in place. > Looking forward to see more updates from the list! > > Best regards, > > -- > Mingcong (Jeff Bai), an AOSC developer > > > > 08.11.2015, 19:59, "Mingye Wang" <[email protected]>: > > Ah, gotcha! > > Well, it's true that I am often (I tried to use sometimes) aggressive, > since I am often bored and need interesting things (like translating > frequently-used modules) to work on. Sorry for that :/ > > Hmm, since many translators are actually doing some reviewing work by > starting from other's work now, it might be a good idea to choose a few new > reviewers from the currently active translatots so we can make better use > of the Damned Lies workflow. I am not quite sure about committers though. > > And again, any thoughts on that proposal? > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015, 9:51 PM Aron Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi again, > > Also I would kindly ask you to be a little bit not that aggressive on > pushing things. It's admirable when you are able to invest a lot of time to > contribute, but we are all volunteers and people might be busy working on > real life stuff. Please be a bit patient and we should be able to work > those things out. > > Thanks, > Aron > > > > On Nov 9, 2015, at 10:47, Aron Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Actually I am active but processing quite slowly, that's my problem. It > would be nice if there could be more people helping on reviewing (seems > only two busy people including myself are doing the work). > > > > Thanks, > > Aron > > > > > > > >> On Nov 9, 2015, at 10:30, Mingye Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hello All, > >> > >> As mentioned in #757792, some master translations are stuck being > >> preserved for translation/reviewing for multiple GNOME releases, for > >> example [GTK+ UI master in zh_CN] has been stuck since 3.14 till now > (3.20). > >> > >> Given that no changes at all on such projects (like hostssh-master and > >> GTK+ UI) happened during this period, plus many translations never > >> reviewed, I consider it necessary to have a more active and (of course) > >> more responsive coordinator to manage the work so translations can go > >> into the tree more effectively. At least we shouldn't see the > >> coordinator in the inactive list, with no reviewers at all. > >> > >> Unfortunately for now, I have no idea about whom to recommend as the new > >> coordinator, since both myself and the translator I know best, JeffBai, > >> are both high school students and have school work to do. We are both > >> happy to review others' translations in our free time though. (Well, > >> actually Bai is almost a College student.) > >> > >> P.S.: Anyone interested in my proposal B in the bug report that all > >> states and comments of a master translation should (optionally) be > >> auto-archived into the corresponding string-frozen branch when master > >> points to a new release milestone? Other technical proposals will be > >> nice too. > >> > >> [GTK+ UI master in > >> zh_CN]:https://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gtk+/master/po/zh_CN > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> > >> Arthur2e5 (0x222D7BDA) > >> > >
_______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
