This is exactly why I started GNOME development so late. Undoubtedly It is
the fastest software , but with poor SDKs , and APIs.
We should step forward in this direction .
Regards

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Allan Day <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Michele Alex D. De Pascalis
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Just look around: Apple and Microsofts have their own SDKs, APIs and
> IDEs perfectly working with them. Compared to these, developing for GNOME
> is way too hard and complicated. Maybe we have the fastest software, but we
> have to write with Gtk, which is just a toolkit, without anything else
> really integrating it. And C is over, so autogenerating a wrapper isn't a
> good solution (talking about gtkmm). If a newbie gets in touch with Cocoa
> and Xcode, he gets templates, he gets wide documentation, he connects
> events with handlers by a drag'n'drop, cutting on the IDE's editor.
> > But it's not just about the IDE itself, it's also about paradigms: Apple
> chose Model View Controller and Delegation, and everything is written
> around these, and it takes seconds to add a View to your application.
> > I'm saying this because I've been learning Cocoa for eight months, and I
> had learnt C++ before. Even now I know C++ is better in many ways, but
> trying back Gtk made me understand it's not about the language, now. Those
> who write iOS or Mac apps know what I mean with all this.
>
> Completely agree. I think that a lot of other GNOME contributors would
> agree also.
>
> I really hope that we will have an SDK one day.
>
> Allan
> --
> IRC:  aday on irc.gnome.org
> Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-love mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-love
>



-- 
Atul jangra
Computer Science and Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology ,Delhi
_______________________________________________
gnome-love mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-love

Reply via email to