On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 00:30 -0400, jordan wrote: > > This is one I think is a valid concern, I will also be using Multimedia > > apps for recording and it looks like GNOME Shell is not the right _desktop_ > > _shell_ at this rate. I remember one poster here who complains, but with no > > solution for the moment, and for sure he switch to another DE. So my > > question is, how is GNOME shell was designed from the ground-up with > > compatibility between applications especially for those 3D apps? Is this a > > valid concern? I hope for 3.2 things will get easier. > I've had issues in with 3D acceleration, on my 2 desktop machines > (nvidia)... Some applications i use, recommend not using compositors > at all.... however, compiz plays quite nice and works, so i use it -
I've had the opposite experience. With compiz and multi-head (second display) acceleration usually got disabled and was at best hit-n-miss. GNOME3 is now working with a second display [not in fail-over mode] which is much appreciated. For me GNOME3's OpenGL based shell seems both faster and more robust than compiz + GNOME2. _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
