hi all, On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Ali Abdul Ghani wrote:
> Quoting Ineiev: > > Perhaps we should consider a distro inactive if it takes more than a month > > to contact its developers, shouldn't we? > I Agree with you. > in fact its must removed > Because They are putting Facebook and google+ and LinkedIn links in web site > the web site of distributions must be free > have fun and be free I agree about this specific case, but disagree with a generic rule of a month. A month is too short. as a developer, sometimes I concentrate and stop interacting with people for even longer periods. there are also vacations and sabbatical periods that people may take. ultimately this rule may also be abused to exclude someone on purpose. I think it should be at least 3 months, preferably 6 months and clearly count three different attempts to contact, perhaps from different people. IMHO I write this because I'm always concerned by such rules and how dull can be their procedural intepretation. We always need to have an "open world assumption" on these matters and involve more than one person in the evaluation. so well, back to Ututo now you can count on more than 3 months and two other people's opinions on this list. ciao
