In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>One does not call BSD using Mach for >Mach, one calls it BSD. I'm not sure what you mean by "for Mach", but if you mean "one doesn't call it Mach" then you're mistaken. I have often heard people refer to it that way, and I can't recall ever hearing them refer to it as BSD. -- Richard -- :wq _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
