> I'm not sure what you mean by "for Mach", but if you mean "one > doesn't call it Mach" then you're mistaken. I have often heard > people refer to it that way, and I can't recall ever hearing them > refer to it as BSD. > > Would be the first time I have heard it, and I have been mucking about > with Mach for quite sometime now.
Perhaps current-day Mach users use different terminology, but in the "old days" (late '80s, early '90s, which was when I had the most exposure to the Mach community) people referred to their computer as running "Mach"; the term "BSD" never came up unless they were explaining the details of the implementation. I'd consider myself part of the old-days, maybe not the early days, but not current-day. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
