>One does not call BSD using Mach for Mach, one calls it BSD. I'm not sure what you mean by "for Mach", but if you mean "one doesn't call it Mach" then you're mistaken. I have often heard people refer to it that way, and I can't recall ever hearing them refer to it as BSD.
Would be the first time I have heard it, and I have been mucking about with Mach for quite sometime now. Then again, people insist that tomatos are vegetables, and not fruits so I am not really suprised. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
