amicus_curious wrote:
How is "neither convinced nor not convinced" different
> than "not yet convinced"?

Were someone to come to court and say that they had photos
of the Loch Ness Monster and ask the court whether or not
the judge believes him, the judge would say that he neither
believes nor disbelieves him, he first wants to see the
photos. Once he sees them, he can decide. In the same way,
the judge wants the harm to be detailed before he decides
whether harm has occurred. The complaint didn't have the
details.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to