"Alexander Terekhov" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> "Jacobsen may file an amended complaint within twenty days of the date
> of this Order.
> Dated: January 5, 2009
> Today is January 5+24 days, 2009.
> No, Hyman?
I am not Jacobsen, and I am not responsible for his case.
Is this an admission of your failure to rationalize Jacobsen's failure
to file an amended complaint within twenty days (noted: you have
mentioned it several times in that time that an amended complaint might
bring some rationale to the table), Hyman? Will you stop your misleading
practice of referring to the Jacobsen's case, then?
To be fair, the case itself has not been litigated yet. The issue here was
simply regarding a preliminary injunction. Jacobsen may have come to the
realization that he was not going to get an injunction without spending far
more money than he had in his pocket. He was on a losing streak, after all.
If/when the case goes to trial and judgement, there will be a lot more to
say.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
