Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <[email protected]> wrote:
Groklaw's Pamela Jones, the Sarah Palin of the Software World is
at it again:
"The court quotes from Microsoft Corp. v. Software Wholesale
Club, Inc.: "the first-sale doctrine does not apply to an
admittedly counterfeit unit". So, no, you can't buy a copy and
use it to go into a counterfeiting business, in effect.
Terekhov's theory has bitten the dust and then had to eat some.
Just like Daniel Wallace's anti-GPL theory did. Whoever is
relying on their legal theories might want to buy a vowel and try
to figure this puzzle out."
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091114101637997
[ and so on .. ]
Rjack, all this lot is pretty much off-topic here. I think you'd
be better debating the matter on groklaw itself, which has an
active forum.
Yeah... an active forum and a black hole where reasonable disagreement
is sent. Since when are GPL discussions "off topic" Lord Mackenzie?
Sincerely,
Rjack
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
