Rjack wrote: > Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Groklaw's Pamela Jones, the Sarah Palin of the Software World is >>> at it again: >> >>> "The court quotes from Microsoft Corp. v. Software Wholesale >>> Club, Inc.: "the first-sale doctrine does not apply to an >>> admittedly counterfeit unit". So, no, you can't buy a copy and >>> use it to go into a counterfeiting business, in effect. >>> Terekhov's theory has bitten the dust and then had to eat some. >>> Just like Daniel Wallace's anti-GPL theory did. Whoever is >>> relying on their legal theories might want to buy a vowel and try >>> to figure this puzzle out." >>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091114101637997 >> >> [ and so on .. ] >> >> Rjack, all this lot is pretty much off-topic here. I think you'd >> be better debating the matter on groklaw itself, which has an >> active forum. > > Yeah... an active forum and a black hole where reasonable disagreement > is sent. Since when are GPL discussions "off topic" Lord Mackenzie? >
In COLA they are. And the shite you post regularly is off-topic on all of usenet -- Your depth of comprehension may tend to make you lax in worldly ways. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
