Hadron wrote: > > Alan Mackenzie <a...@muc.de> writes: > > > In gnu.misc.discuss Hadron <hadronqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Didn't Alan boldly claim that the GPL was "easy to understand"? > > > > Yes. The GPL is very easy to understand. It's USA copyright law which > > is hard. > > > > The only people who find the GPL hard are those who seek a legal means of > > violating it. > > And just about everyone that ever uses it, reads it or discusses it. I > find it amazing that you keep insisting it is so easy and yet we see you > embroiled in nitpicking over meaning time and time again. You're either > very thick skinned or in denial.
Note that even Pee Jay has admitted that "a lot of people don't understand the GPL, including some lawyers" http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20031214210634851 <chuckles> regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
