Hadron wrote: > Alan Mackenzie <a...@muc.de> writes: > >> In gnu.misc.discuss Hadron <hadronqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Didn't Alan boldly claim that the GPL was "easy to understand"? >> >> Yes. The GPL is very easy to understand. It's USA copyright law which >> is hard. >> >> The only people who find the GPL hard are those who seek a legal means >> of violating it. > > And just about everyone that ever uses it, reads it or discusses it. I > find it amazing that you keep insisting it is so easy and yet we see you > embroiled in nitpicking over meaning time and time again. You're either > very thick skinned or in denial.
"Nitpicking" are the cretins like Rjack or Alex T They are either too thick to understand simple concepts, or they don't want to "understand" to keep on trolling The GPL *is* simple to understand. That *you* are unable to is not surprising. You would not understand the simplest of things -- A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
