On 2009-12-18, Hadron <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Alan Mackenzie <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> In gnu.misc.discuss Hadron <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Didn't Alan boldly claim that the GPL was "easy to understand"?
>>
>> Yes. The GPL is very easy to understand. It's USA copyright law which
>> is hard.
>>
>> The only people who find the GPL hard are those who seek a legal means of
>> violating it.
>
> And just about everyone that ever uses it, reads it or discusses it. I
Nope.
Only a few self-centered trouble makers choose to make anything complicated
out of it. Typically, these people have a toddler's view of property rights.
> find it amazing that you keep insisting it is so easy and yet we see you
> embroiled in nitpicking over meaning time and time again. You're either
> very thick skinned or in denial.
>
>
--
The social cost of suing/prosecuting individuals |||
for non-commercial copyright infringement far outweighs / | \
the social value of copyright to begin with.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
