Peter Köhlmann <[email protected]> writes: > Hadron wrote: > >> Alan Mackenzie <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> In gnu.misc.discuss Hadron <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Didn't Alan boldly claim that the GPL was "easy to understand"? >>> >>> Yes. The GPL is very easy to understand. It's USA copyright law which >>> is hard. >>> >>> The only people who find the GPL hard are those who seek a legal means >>> of violating it. >> >> And just about everyone that ever uses it, reads it or discusses it. I >> find it amazing that you keep insisting it is so easy and yet we see you >> embroiled in nitpicking over meaning time and time again. You're either >> very thick skinned or in denial. > > "Nitpicking" are the cretins like Rjack or Alex T > They are either too thick to understand simple concepts, or they don't > want to "understand" to keep on trolling > > The GPL *is* simple to understand. That *you* are unable to is not > surprising. You would not understand the simplest of things
Says the closed source windows programmer who insists its ok to dereference a null pointer in C. You have zero credibility. Go away. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
