In gnu.misc.discuss RJack <[email protected]> wrote: > Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> I suggest you email all these lawyers to point out the fraud you >> allege. > I am quite busy with grandkids this week but I an aware of other's > efforts to do that very thing wrt the legal departments of the fourteen > corporate defendants. Hope you have a good week with the little terrors. > I suspect Erik Andersen has stepped on his weenie this time. All > charades have to end eventually. It's tough to have your bluff called. > Paying fourteen legal firms attorney fees because of a fraudulent > copyright claim could be very expensive. We shall see, in the fullness of time. However, it's not a fraudulent claim. It would appear that busybox's copyright has been violated, and Erik Andersen is a copyright holder. If a case is dismissed on a technicality, that isn't fraud. However, if your view of the case were accurate, the SFLC wouldn't have Started it in the first place. I suspect the usual thing will happen, there will be a settlement with each defendent involving it coming into compliance with the GPL, appointing a compliance officer, and paying an unspecified sum in damages. Further speculation seems pointless. > Sincerely, > RJack -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
