On 4/11/2010 3:23 PM, RJack wrote:
 So where's the link to
"BusyBox v. 0.60.3" which the SFLC claims causes the infringement problems?

The SFLC does not claim that BusyBox v. 0.60.3 causes the
infringement problem. This can easily be seen by reading
the complaint,
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to