On 4/11/2010 3:23 PM, RJack wrote:
So where's the link to "BusyBox v. 0.60.3" which the SFLC claims causes the infringement problems?
The SFLC does not claim that BusyBox v. 0.60.3 causes the infringement problem. This can easily be seen by reading the complaint, <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
