Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/11/2010 3:23 PM, RJack wrote:
So where's the link to "BusyBox v. 0.60.3" which the SFLC claims
causes the infringement problems?
The SFLC does not claim that BusyBox v. 0.60.3 causes the
infringement problem. This can easily be seen by reading the
complaint,
<http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>.
It claims infringement of "BusyBox v. 0.60.3" causes the problem. Who
are people going to believe? You or their lyin' eyes? If you continue to
moooooooooooooooooooooove the goalposts far enough they'll eventually
come back around and bite you in the ass from behind. ROFL.
Sincerely,
RJack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
