Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/11/2010 3:23 PM, RJack wrote:
So where's the link to "BusyBox v. 0.60.3" which the SFLC claims causes the infringement problems?

The SFLC does not claim that BusyBox v. 0.60.3 causes the infringement problem. This can easily be seen by reading the complaint, <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>.

It claims infringement of "BusyBox v. 0.60.3" causes the problem. Who
are people going to believe? You or their lyin' eyes? If you continue to
moooooooooooooooooooooove the goalposts far enough they'll eventually
come back around and bite you in the ass from behind. ROFL.

RJack :)

gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to