On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:29:54 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 7/14/13 5:38 PM, in article krvgaa$ebu$1...@dont-email.me, "Red Blade" > <penac...@yomomma.hot.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 16:46:37 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 7/14/13 3:59 PM, in article krvagj$p0k$1...@dont-email.me, "Red Blade" >>> <penac...@yomomma.hot.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 10:54:24 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> Obama is an American born citizen, born in Hawaii. >>>> >>>> It doesn't matter. From my original post: >>>> >>>> Red Blade wrote: >>>>>> the Supreme Court ruled in the 1800s that natural-born citizen >>>>>> required two American-born parents and the case was dismissed, >>>>>> etc). >>>>>> >>> What matters is where the person was born - not where there parents >>> were. >>> Your claim was argued in Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party and failed. >> >> Obama's father was born in Kenya, and he was never an American citizen. > > Is this in contention? >
No, that's what the Supreme Court set in stone two centuries ago, and cowardly dismissed the case this century. Natural born citizen = two citizen parents. Obama's father was never an American citizen, and at the time of his birth he was a colonial-British citizen. -- Red Blade http://www.libertycolumns.com/ http://www.danq.co/ http://www.twitter.co/danqco/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
