> That is clearly false. I've asked repeatedly if for example RMS, the > person who can actually decide on topics like governance, is included > in these discussions -- this has been answered with abundant silence.
Maybe because there is nothing to say? Richard is the deciding factor of the GNU project. He is not a stakeholder, nor are you someone who decides how this project makes decisions. >>From what he wrote on a private mailing list, he is aware of this public exchange. And yet, you ignore it. It was explictly asked, and requested, to keep these discussions on internal lists.
