> That is clearly false.  I've asked repeatedly if for example RMS, the
   > person who can actually decide on topics like governance, is included
   > in these discussions -- this has been answered with abundant silence.

   Maybe because there is nothing to say? 

Richard is the deciding factor of the GNU project.  He is not a
stakeholder, nor are you someone who decides how this project makes

   >>From what he wrote on a private mailing list, he is aware of this public

And yet, you ignore it.  It was explictly asked, and requested, to
keep these discussions on internal lists.

Reply via email to