[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 8. At least the data structures will be open and free. We are thinking
> about the code... but I am strongly arguing for /at least/ a SCSL style
> facility (basically free to you, list reader) if not GPL. Depends on the
> sponsors. We will have to retain control of the source though: I'm sure
> the Lily people will understand this.
I don't think I understand. What is SCSL? What control of the source
do you need? You, being the author, are free to set and break
whatever licensing policy you invent, even if the policy is GPL. What
more control do you need?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GNU LilyPond - The Music Typesetter
http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/index.html
- Unidentified subject! Tom Cato Amundsen
- Unidentified subject! Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Unidentified subject! Adrian Mariano
- Re: Unidentified subject! Tom Cato Amundsen
- Unidentified subject! Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Spacing problem Mats Bengtsson
- Unidentified subject! A J Tee
- Unidentified subject! Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Unidentified subject! Werner LEMBERG
- Score editors and the rest Nick Bailey
- Re: Score editors and the rest Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Score editors and the re... Nick Bailey
- Re: Score editors and the rest Werner LEMBERG
- Unidentified subject! August S.Sigov
- Unidentified subject! August S.Sigov
- Re: Unidentified subject! Tom Cato Amundsen
- Unidentified subject! Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Unidentified subject! Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Unidentified subject! Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab
- Unidentified subject! Werner LEMBERG
- Unidentified subject! Han-Wen Nienhuys
