On Wednesday, 22 April 1998, Arvid =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gr=F8tting?= writes:
> There's nothing much wrong with the bracket; it wasn't aligned
> properly (fixed by now), and its scaling could be done more
> efficiently[1], either (1) by doing it in PostScript, (2) by drawing the
> extensible part using tex primitives, or (3) by calling it a math
> bracket and splitting it up.
>
> I, for one, don't like the idea of making it in ps (I like mf),
> especially as it already looks nice as a metafont font. (2) and (3)
> requires about exactly the same amount of work, so I guess it's a
> matter of taste. Drawing the vertical part in ps while keeping the
> ends in mf would, I guess, require more work than (2) or (3).
I didn't really fancy the fuss of splitting this thing up, so i
rewrote it in ps yesterday. It'll be in pl 59. If you want to
see it now, i can send it to the list.
> Anyway, I'll look into solutions (2) and (3), ok?
Oops, i hope that you've not put too much work into this...
(or that your solution is better :-)
Greetings,
Jan.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LilyPond - The GNU music typesetter
http://www.digicash.com/~jan | http://www.cs.ruu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond
