Trevor Morris wrote: > On 4/14/05, Gunnar Farneb�ck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Paul wrote: > > > > I object. In a future multithreaded version one would probably want > > > > to use multiple boards within a single engine instance, e.g. to make > > > > parallell tactical reading. Then this naming wouldn't make much > > > > sense. > > > > > > OK, what names do you propose? > > > > Although it's already in use, I think "struct board_state" is a fairly > > good name. As for the name of the pointer being passed around I prefer > > something short since it's going to be typed a lot, maybe even just > > "b". > > Wouldn't the obvious name be "bs"?
The obvious name would be `board' or `state'. Names like `bs' are not obvious. However, if Gunnar doesn't want to type, it seems we'll have to use those. Paul _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
