No, 27,995 still to be converted :-)

Jan

On 9 Aug 2012, at 12:05, Laurent Romary wrote:

> So you know 27,995 which are working without any private publisher in the 
> loop and no author/reader fee. 
> Laurent 
> 
> Le 9 août 2012 à 11:55, Jan Velterop a écrit :
> 
>> It's a start. 27,995 or so to go.
>> 
>> Jan
>> 
>> On 9 Aug 2012, at 11:43, Laurent Romary wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks. Are these all managed on their own?
>>> Laurent
>>> 
>>> Le 9 août 2012 à 11:42, Bo-Christer Björk a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> Good idea,
>>>> 
>>>> Here are four such journals, all of which have been there since the 1990s:
>>>> 
>>>> Information Research
>>>> 
>>>> Journal of Information Technology in Construction
>>>> 
>>>> Journal of Electronic Publishing
>>>> 
>>>> First Monday
>>>> 
>>>> best regards
>>>> 
>>>> Bo-Christer Björk
>>>> 
>>>> Journal of On 8/9/12 11:35 AM, Laurent Romary wrote:
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>> As an echo to the fourth option mentioned by Peter, I would like to 
>>>>> gather references to journals and initiatives which are notoriously 
>>>>> community based. Could members of the list point to what they would be 
>>>>> aware of? 
>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>> Laurent
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le 7 août 2012 à 16:11, Peter Murray-Rust a écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Sally Morris 
>>>>>> <sa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> We should not delude ourselves; journals can only be 'free' if someone 
>>>>>> pays
>>>>>> the costs.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All the work involved in creating and running a journal has to be paid 
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> somehow - they don't magically go away if a journal is e-only (in fact,
>>>>>> there are some new costs, even though some of the old ones disappear).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I can only see three options for who pays:  reader-side (e.g. the 
>>>>>> library);
>>>>>> author-side (e.g. publication fees);  or 'fairy godmother' (e.g. 
>>>>>> sponsor).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is a fourth option, which works: the scholarly community manage 
>>>>>> publication through contributed labour and resources and the net amount 
>>>>>> of cash is near-zero. This is described in 
>>>>>> http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2012/03/06/an-efficient-journal/ 
>>>>>> where the J. Machine Learning Research is among the highest regarded 
>>>>>> journals in the area (top 7%) and free-to-authors and free-to-readers. 
>>>>>> There is an enlightening debate (on this URL) between those who run the 
>>>>>> journal and Kent Anderson of the Scholarly Kitchen who cannot believe 
>>>>>> that people will run and work for journals for the good of the community.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is no law of physics that says this doesn't scale. It is simply 
>>>>>> that most scholars would rather the taxpayer and students paid for the 
>>>>>> administration publishing (either as author-side or reader-side) so the 
>>>>>> scholars don't have to do the work. And they've managed ot get 10 B USD 
>>>>>> per year. If scholars regarded publishing as part of their role, of if 
>>>>>> they were prepared to involved the wider community (as Wikipedia has 
>>>>>> done) we could have a much more C21 type of activity - innovative and 
>>>>>> valuable to the whole world rather than just academia. It would cost 
>>>>>> zero, but it would be much cheaper than any current model.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And of course we now have a complete free map of the whole world 
>>>>>> (openstreetmap.org) which is so much better than other alternatives that 
>>>>>> many people and organizations are switching to it. And, for many years, 
>>>>>> it didn't have a bank account and existed on "marginal resources" from 
>>>>>> UCL (and probably still does).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But most people will regard this as another fairy tale.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Peter Murray-Rust
>>>>>> Reader in Molecular Informatics
>>>>>> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
>>>>>> University of Cambridge
>>>>>> CB2 1EW, UK
>>>>>> +44-1223-763069
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> GOAL mailing list
>>>>>> GOAL@eprints.org
>>>>>> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
>>>>> 
>>>>> Laurent Romary
>>>>> INRIA & HUB-IDSL
>>>>> laurent.rom...@inria.fr
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> GOAL mailing list
>>>>> GOAL@eprints.org
>>>>> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Laurent Romary
>>> INRIA & HUB-IDSL
>>> laurent.rom...@inria.fr
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GOAL mailing list
>>> GOAL@eprints.org
>>> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> GOAL mailing list
>> GOAL@eprints.org
>> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
> 
> Laurent Romary
> INRIA & HUB-IDSL
> laurent.rom...@inria.fr
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to