########################################################################## # If Goanet stops reaching you, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # Want to check the archives? http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others # ##########################################################################
Cornel, I have been very detailed and specific. So, instead of discussing generalities like whose objectivity is better, which is a meaningless excercise, and talking about every other issue under the sun than the topic of discussion, please feel free to challenge my facts and logic, point-by-point, with facts and logic of your own. Half-truths, untruths, faulty logic and false comparisons will be responded to with an opposing point of view. --- cornel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ########################################################################## > # If Goanet stops reaching you, contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] # > # Want to check the archives? > http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # > # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to > reflect respect to others # > ########################################################################## > > Mario, > Methinks the trouble with your posts lies in your > belief that your > objectivity is better than the other guy's > objectivity! Also, that you have > the facts while others do not. I put it to you that > much of your facticity > is seriously questionable and straight from > right-wing thinking in the USA, > which in turn is largely controlled by the Jews in > America. A look into > serious quality international papers of the Left > (including Jews highly > critical of Israeli policy in Palestine) would be an > absolute eye-opener to > you. > There are many alternative views to yours and > I'll be brief, otherwise one can just go on and on > re this issue. The Barak > and Clinton deal was wisely rejected by Arafat as it > would have reduced the > proposed Palestinian State to a collection of mere > powerless colonial > Bantustans as in the former South Africa. Secondly, > the Zionist agenda is > undoubtedly to push the Palestinians out of their > legitimately held > homeland and they have been very successful so far > with American support. > In contrast, the Palestinian call to drive the > Israelis into the sea is > seemingly feeble and merely the rhetoric of victims > of a mighty oppressor. > Please do not ever forget that Israel was born > through terrorism against > anyone who stood in their way, be it the British or > Arab. It continues to be > a terrorist state, ready to attack any neighbouring > state and Iran is > especially vulnerable at this moment in time. Your > comparison with the > Indian/Pakistani partition in 1947 is a red herring. > All that Israel has to > do, without delay, is to get to the UN partition > lines for a two-state > solution. In other words, stop the occupation first > before making > unacceptable demands from the Palestinians. > I respect you for your strongly held views and would > defend your right to > these. I hope you can also respect the views of > others which are > diametrically opposed to yours and are also strongly > held. > Cornel > > > > >
