------------------------------------------------------------------------ * G * O * A * N * E * T **** C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enjoy your holiday in Goa. Stay at THE GARCA BRANCA from November to May There is no better, value for money, guest house. Confirm your bookings early or miss-out
Visit http://www.garcabranca.com for details/booking/confirmation. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Joe Vaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joes Response: > Who are these minority extremists? What is your > source and proof that I > have chosen the side of extremists (majority or > minority)? --- Come on Joe. You have sided with the goons who threated violence to ensure that the owners of the INOX pulled the movie out and then attributed this as being a democratic! > What good is a religious following, if we cannot > respect, have compassion > and tolerance for one anothers religion? If I had a > Hindu neighbor to my > right and a muslim neighbor to my left it wouldnt > make a difference to me, > for as long as we all lived in harmony with mutual > respect for one another. -- It is good that you state this. However, you seem to contradict the above, with your support for the use of threats and violence to impose a ban on the movie. Totally inconsistent. > Joe Vaz: > Isnt it ridiculous that you dont even know who > owns (or is founder of) > www.catholic-goan-network.net? Yet you somehow > support it? Strange! > I think you need to be clear-headed Marlon, when you > write. Check the facts > first, before making nonsensical allegations and > spurious statements. First > of, who tells you that I own Goan Catholic Network > or am the founder of it? > In that, what do you mean by YOUR goan catholic > network? ---> Duh, I do know who founded the network and I have even met him. You are one of the core founding members of the group who was involved in its setup. > Joe responds: > You avoided my direct question regarding casualties. > Wonder if you have an > answer to defend your specious statements. ---> The casualty was freedom of expression. The only reason why there were no physical casualties was because the owners of Inox withdrew the movie. Again, it is a real pity that you backed the potential use of violence to support your religious cause. > Politicians always make threats, are you from Mars? > How about the US? Do > you have anything to learn from the US politics, in > terms of threats and > war? Or are you deep in the Valley, not to know > whats going on in your own > backyard? --> Political loud talk and manouvering is quite different from the treat of use of physical violence against specific individuals. Can we say Mob rule? Marlon Menezes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote: >[Marlon: The server/mailing list should have no problems handling a list >that is much larger.] > Joe: Good! Then this issue is NOT a (technical) > problem. > In a related message: Marlon Menezes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made a final admission: The server/mailing list should have no problems handling a list that is much larger. I guess it is a question of posting repititious messages .. My statements above are quite consistent. There was no issue with load on the server handling the volume. The real issue what that, we previously had dozens of posts from goanetters wishing each other on a particular festive occassion, thus causing major problems for the users in Goa. We were simply being diligent to ensure that this be avoided again. In every public forum, there will always be some give and take. Furthermore, with improvements and lower costs of connectivity in Goa, this issue would no longer be valid today. >Joe responds: >Check it out yourself, Marlon! There were a few >congratulatory >messages >posted by Goanetters among these were messages on >your wedding. I, >however, wish you well. The others were >congratulatory posts >felicitating >your organization (at least one of these >congratulatory messages was >from >me,) to which I most certainly take no objection, -- >and were posted in >or >around the same time you raised objections regarding >the two Dussehra >greetings posting. --- It is very unlikely that I would have been administering goanet and be getting married at the same time! Furthermore, let me make it clear that I DID NOT appreciate my personal life being made public on goanet via those greetings that were made to me. These posts were not initated by me, nor was I admin at that time. Your claims that I approved posts touting my personal life on goanet is again fraudulant, just as your claim about yahoo groups. Marlon _____________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. Goanet mailing list (Goanet@goanet.org)