------------------------------------------------------------------------
 2006 * * * Y  E  A  R * * * O  F * * * T  H  E * * * S  E  N  I  O  R
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goa Sudharop Annual Awards on November 20, 2006 @ Mandovi Hotel @ 4:30pm
            Chief Guest: Dr. Asha Vishwanath Sawardekar

    A series of essays as a tribute to Goan Seniors can be found at:

     http://www.goanet.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=524
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Now, before you say China is not the right example,
> labour flows in China is much the say way as it
> would in the US, dictated by demand, supply and the 
> market wage-rate. Which is why peasants forsake 
> their jobs in the countryside and make their way to 
> manufacturing units in the cities. However, given 
> human greed it is easy to exploit them.
>
Mario asks:
>
So, according to you, there is no difference between a
communist system and a free-market system, which is
patently absurd.
>
Who decides whether a person is "exploited" and to
what extent?
>
Based on the socialist standards of Europe every
American and Indian worker would be considered
"exploited".
>
Selma writes:
> 
> In the same issue there is an interview with Azim
> Premji of Wipro. He has this to say about wages in
> India:
> 
> EXCERPT:
> An Indian engineer from a good university costs
> between $8000 and $9000 a year compared with $45,000
> in the US or Europe. .....it would take more than 30
> years for the two to converge.
> End of excerpt.
> 
> That's about 4.5 lakhs for an engineer, even
> adjusted for purchasing power parity, that's a huge
> difference with his US counterpart. Indian 
> companies will only get greedier with whitecollare 
> outsourced business, just like China does with the 
> manufacturing jobs.  The pressure to produce more 
> for less is a main component of capitalism.
>
Mario responds:
>
So, who decides what the wages and conditions should
be when there are workers willing to accept what is
being offered?
>
Selma writes:
> 
> I'm a die hard capitalist but the free-market cannot
> be counted on to be an equaliser of human rights.
> That has to come from the conscience of the 
> community.
> 
> Now before you give me some free-market rhetoric,
> for once I'd like an answer that really examines the
> issues.
> 
Mario responds:
>
You are about as die-hard a capitalist as Karl Marx. 
A real examination of the issues would include the
fact that it is no one else's business what a worker
is willing to accept in terms of wages and benefits.
>
_______________________________________________
Goanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org

Reply via email to