On 3/1/07, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:28:37 -0300 > Rafael Jeffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Anyway, I can't agree with you about not using XMMS. ;) > > > For me, after evaluating almost every audio player, XMMS is my > > > choice. And > > > yes, it uses CPU resources very consciously. > > > > > > > Don't get me wrong, I haven't found any audio player as good as XMMS. > > It does what it have to do, it does it extremelly well, and it's > > resource usage is very well thought. > > OK, I got it wrong in your last message. Regarding GTK1, it is also used by > Vim if you prefer X11 fonts instead of TTF (like me). The good point about > this, IMHO, is that even a 850 MHz CPU (mine) can compile it in a few minutes, > and you usually do it once per fresh installation. :) > > And by the way, the XMMS cvs is still active. :)
I'm running an interesting player on the ARM called GQmpeg. It's pretty interesting, uses relatively small resources, but I never tried to compare it with Audacious, for example. By the way, isn't Audacious "good enough"? It's shipped on 013 by default, and it seems to do a pretty good job. -- Lucas powered by /dev/dsp _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
