Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On 3/1/07, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:28:37 -0300 >> Rafael Jeffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>> Anyway, I can't agree with you about not using XMMS. ;) >>>> For me, after evaluating almost every audio player, XMMS is my >>>> choice. And >>>> yes, it uses CPU resources very consciously. >>>> >>> Don't get me wrong, I haven't found any audio player as good as XMMS. >>> It does what it have to do, it does it extremelly well, and it's >>> resource usage is very well thought. >> OK, I got it wrong in your last message. Regarding GTK1, it is also used by >> Vim if you prefer X11 fonts instead of TTF (like me). The good point about >> this, IMHO, is that even a 850 MHz CPU (mine) can compile it in a few >> minutes, >> and you usually do it once per fresh installation. :) >> >> And by the way, the XMMS cvs is still active. :) > > I'm running an interesting player on the ARM called GQmpeg. It's > pretty interesting, uses relatively small resources, but I never tried > to compare it with Audacious, for example. By the way, isn't Audacious > "good enough"? It's shipped on 013 by default, and it seems to do a > pretty good job.
I didn't know about Audacious! =) But I had it installed here (default 013) and I love it, it's exactly like XMMS but for GTK2, so now I'll send both XMMS and GTK1 to the trash. -- /Jonatan -=( http://kymatica.com )=- _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
