Yeah! And since I've learnt English mostly from SciFi and Fantasy movie
heroes (with a misplaced sense of self-righteousness), I make boo boos from
time to time - which are not that harmful and entertain people! :)
There are other things that I might be interested to be improved about Go
(MO-Oriented improvements which MO-Oriented tweaks about the syntax are
just a small part of it). But as for this thread seems the discussion made
it's way to a level that needs some more time to manifest itself as
conclusions - if it meant to be any at all.
And I'm positive Go will continue to grow and get better at things.
On Monday, February 19, 2018 at 3:03:18 PM UTC+3:30, RickyS wrote:
> 1. Oh, I'm all for improvement. I just want somebody to invent
> something in the field of re-use that is as much a breakthrough as
> Cooperating Sequential Processes was to the field of multi-processing. Go
> would be a good place to install that invention, as it is still a simple
> 2. And you mean go must *adapt*, perhaps by ad*o*pting new features...
> On Monday, February 19, 2018 at 1:17:22 PM UTC+2, dc0d wrote:
>> ...Go must adopt. ...
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.