Cool work!
What I found most astonishing on a first look: Not all
parentheses ( are closed: 4 ) seem to be missing??
For { 5 are unclosed while there is one more ] than [ ?
Are you parsing testfiles with deliberate errors?
V.
On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:08:44 UTC+2, Michael Jones wrote:
>
> I've been working on a cascade of projects, each needing the next as a
> part, the most recent being rewriting text.Scanner. It was not a goal, but
> the existing scanner does not do what I need (recognize Go operators,
> number types, and more) and my shim code was nearly as big as the standard
> library scanner itself, so I just sat down an rewrote it cleanly.
>
> To test beyond hand-crafted edge cases it seemed good to try it against a
> large body of Go code. I chose the Go 1.13 code base, and because the
> results are interesting on their own beyond my purpose of code testing, I
> thought to share what I've noticed as a Github Gist on the subject of the
> "Go Popularity Contest"—what are the most used types, most referenced
> packages, most and least popular operators, etc. The data are interesting,
> but I'll let it speak for itself. Find it here:
>
> https://gist.github.com/MichaelTJones/ca0fd339401ebbe79b9cbb5044afcfe2
>
> Michael
>
> P.S. Generated by go test. I just cut off the "passed" line and posted it.
> ;-)
>
> --
>
> *Michael T. jonesmichae...@gmail.com <javascript:>*
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/1a0e2b4b-9276-4418-929c-51888cf2c93a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
