This is interesting. I have exactly the opposite situation; up-down is
much easier than significant left-right because of faulty saccades.
On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 11:41 -0700, Michael Jones wrote:
> Bakul, more good arguments. I have another motivation in the "?"
> world that
> I've not argued because it is personal/not general, but a decade ago
> I had
> two detached retinas, surgeries, and imperfect recovery. Part of my
> vision
> that I lost is just below the center...maybe -15 degrees to -40
> degrees.
> The brain knows when I want to see things things there and moves the
> eyes
> around to gather that part of the visual field. This "hunting" is
> tiring of
> the muscles and causes issues. left-to-right density is easy for me,
> vertical is very bad. Your:
>
> x := b? 2 : 1
>
> is instantaneous, a sight read; while the:
>
> var x int
> if b {
> x = 2
> } else {
> x = 1
> }
>
> and
>
> x := 1
> if b {
> x = 2
> }
>
> ...feel like climbing Everest. It is hard to explain the difficulty.
> Fortunately it is not a widespread problem. Certainly not Go's
> problem, but
> I'd pay double for a "wide" mode where gofmt tolerated "var x int; if
> b { x
> = 2 } else { x = 1 }". In fact, now that i've just seen this, I am
> going to
> make a local version and hook it to vs code. Why did I not think of
> this
> before! Wow.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/e256bf8c6f380acf4999385f4d1e557f1f201d6b.camel%40kortschak.io.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
