It's all good, we're just trying to get to the bottom of the issue. I'm sure the use of the word "enhancer" was just contextual. You have indeed demonstrated that datanucleus isn't complaining. We're all friends here :) thanks for helping us narrow the the root cause of the problem down.
Thanks, -bryce On Dec 8, 2009 11:18 AM, "datanucleus" <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) why the enhancer complains that BaseObject need to be enhanced even > though it does not declar... There is no problem presented here with the "enhancer" complaining. All is at runtime actually, thrown from a call by GAE/J's DN plugin, as shown by the stack trace above. As I've already stated, DataNucleus does NOT require any base class to be persistent when the classes are declared as I've already shown. If you have some other situation then demonstrate it -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine fo... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
