I've posted a bug fix release candidate containing this fix here: http://datanucleus-appengine.googlecode.com/files/appengine-orm-1.0.4.1.RC1.zip
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:26 PM, bryce cottam <[email protected]> wrote: > That's great news Max! Thanks so much for looking into this and getting a > solution in the works so fast. > > Thanks, > -bryce > > On Dec 8, 2009 5:20 PM, "Max Ross (Google)" > <[email protected]<maxr%[email protected]>> > wrote: > > I've filed bug > http://code.google.com/p/datanucleus-appengine/issues/detail?id=169 to > track the problem with non-persistent base classes. I have a fix in the > works. I'll be posting a release candidate with this fix and hopefully a > few others in the next day or two. > > Thanks, > Max > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, bryce cottam <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > It's all good, we're just trying to get to the bottom of the issue. >> I'm sure the use of the word... >> >> -- >> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Google App Engine fo... >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Google App Engine f... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-appengine-java%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
