That's great news Max! Thanks so much for looking into this and getting a solution in the works so fast.
Thanks, -bryce On Dec 8, 2009 5:20 PM, "Max Ross (Google)" <maxr+appeng...@google.com<maxr%2bappeng...@google.com>> wrote: I've filed bug http://code.google.com/p/datanucleus-appengine/issues/detail?id=169 to track the problem with non-persistent base classes. I have a fix in the works. I'll be posting a release candidate with this fix and hopefully a few others in the next day or two. Thanks, Max On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, bryce cottam <bcot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It's all good, we're just trying to get to the bottom of the issue. I'm > sure the use of the word... > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Google App Engine fo... > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine f... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
