Pay pal will do $5 a year annual subscriptions. It has a front end... if there is a front end you can stick ads there... Yeah iphone sucks for ad revenue....Have you considered that "Other" mobile OS, the one from Google? ;-)
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Schnitzer Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:47 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: FAQ for out of preview pricing changes You presume that my app has a web front end. Most of the users of this particular app are iPhone clients, and the developer responsible for that code has moved on to other projects. ...and actually, there does seem to be a vast chasm between successful apps and unsuccessful ones. I'm not entirely certain why. It may partly be due to the fact that no payment system in the world lets you charge $0.50/mo. Jeff On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Brandon Wirtz <[email protected]> wrote: > Anything getting enough traffic to cross the free barrier should be > able to have a revenue stream. Especially if you thought it was going > to be a commercial venture. And this is cold hearted but if you have > loyal users who are using the app that much and none of them will pony > up $.50 a month... That's rough. > > The Reason I don't think anyone should complain about the $9 number is > that anyone should be able to put Adsense on their app and make $9. > > I may be biased, but I have an App that averages a penny a day right > now, and generates $2500 a month in Adsense. There has to be some > economic model that works between my extreme and yours. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Schnitzer > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:10 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: FAQ for out of preview pricing > changes > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Brandon Wirtz <[email protected]> wrote: >> Put some ads on it and it should get to the $9 a month. Put a donate >> button on it. > > It's never that simple, and certainly isn't in this case. > > That said, Google certainly doesn't owe anyone a free service layer, > nor a linear ramp-up to paid service. And apps around the limit of > the free service tier are probably something to discourage since they > actually consume resources. Still, I'm more likely to contribute > *some* money for my forlorn projects if the cost was not a > discontiguous function. > > Jeff > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
