On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Robert Kluin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, exactly.  There are several other variations on the same theme
> too.  If you were to use long-running tasks or cron-jobs for this you
> might need some type of locks or guards in case two run at the same
> time.  A backend should simplify the process quite a bit since a
> process can run for a very long time (24 hours) and you can crank up
> the memory; the downside is that backends extremely expensive and they
> won't be able to scale as wide as a task-based method.

Thanks a lot for all your help.
I'll first validate the concept using Crons. It will allow me to test
everything with no or little cost in a first time. And given that the
application is for now in a prototype phase with little traffic, I
think the risk of locking is rather low.
If this go well, I'll look into using a backend, and how to handle
communication between backend and frontend (Tim suggested XMPP, but
from what I saw in the documentation it is not possible to directly
communicate with the frontend).

Thanks again :)
-- 
Sébastien Tromp

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to