Hi Vision Jinx, There is still a focus on iGoogle, but a priority is bringing compatibility with OpenSocial. I think you'll agree that it's an important integration, because it will bring a number of new features to iGoogle and improve the process for adding new features.
If you have feature requests for gadgets.* or OpenSocial, there is a discussion group dedicated to discussion of additions to the specification: http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-and-gadgets-spec/topics. Features added to the spec will most likely make it to iGoogle when it supports OpenSocial (and should appear in the sandbox soon after being added to the spec). Best, Dan On Oct 6, 5:59 am, "Vision Jinx (Guru)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > You can make the suggestion to the Google team by reading this thread > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API/browse_thread/threa... > > The only issue is use the OpenSocial feature requests and if they feel > it will benefit all the other social containers it may get added but > as posted several times by Google any feature requests for the 'legacy > api' will get their lowest possible priority (deprecated container), > so if it is something the Open Social community would love you got a > chance but anything to better our beloved iGoogle well, those requests > will go unheard more then likely since their focus is no longer on > iGoogle but the Open Social container instead. > > Hope that helps :-) > > Cheers! > Vision Jinx > > On Oct 1, 3:11 am, Lavallefils <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > Have just finish my first igoogle gadget (http:// > > igooglets.blogspot.com/2008/09/birthday-gifts-wall.html) in which i > > used the collaborative option (<Optional feature="shareable-prefs"/>) > > where a gadget can be shared and everyone can edit the settings for > > the gadget. > > > While working on the collaborative gadget, i found that i was not able > > to implement additional features that i wanted to add to the gadget. > > One of the feature was to limit the number of gifts that someone can > > offer in the birthday_gifts_wall gadget to prevent any abuse. > > > But the collaborative option makes all the user preferences editable. > > It would be great if can specify only a set of user preferences as > > editable and the remaining remains private for each instance of the > > gadget. In that way, i could have set one of the private preferences > > to indicate that for a particular instance of the gadget a gift has > > already been offered and still allow to collaborate by giving a gift > > which will be seen by all shared gadget via the shared preferences. > > > Moreover, this will make it possible to do simple two persons turn > > based game gadget coz each will have his own private data to be ale to > > check whose turn is and whether he is allowed to play and still play > > with the other person coz his play will be published to the other > > player via the shared preferences. And i let u guys/girls out there to > > try to imagine more things that can be done with this feature. > > > Well its just an idea i wanted to share with > > > Cheers > > Laval --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iGoogle Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
