Oh, right!  I forgot about that extension introspection stuff (after saying
I'd look at it)....  Oops.  Added a new issue @
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=524 .

Re: injector builder -> module config... see the comments @
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=510 .  I'm not
convinced that setting the options in a Module makes sense for these kinds
of settings.

sam

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Dhanji R. Prasanna <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hey thanks for this list...
>
> Persist extension is wanting, It'll be another week at least before I can
> give it the right attention. For servlet, we need to build some kind of
> introspection API that's similar to injector's, but that can wait I suppose.
>
> If we can turn injector builder's options into some kind of module config
> that would rule...
>
> Dhanji.
>
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Sam Berlin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Here's another status update (in an effort to get 3.0 out soon) --
>>
>> Open issues:
>>
>>  * 366 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=366> -
>> @Provides doesn't respect @Nullable
>>    Status: Patch attached [from me], needs review (it adds APIs).
>>
>>  * 436 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=436> -
>> Provide access to Guice's own internal TypeConverters
>>    Status: Patch attached [from Stuart], needs review (it adds APIs, makes
>> some classes public, and changes a bit of the internals).
>>
>>  * 508 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=508> - AOP
>> visibility checks should include the method return type.
>>    Status: Patch attached [from Stuart], just waiting on some tests before
>> applying.
>>
>>  * 509 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=509> -
>> Cache result of Class.getAnnotations()
>>    Status: Perf improvement request, no patch attached.
>>
>>  * 510 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=510> -
>> Remove InjectorBuilder
>>    Status: Rationale for keeping InjectorBuilder listed in the comments
>> along with other possible scenarios, awaiting replies.
>>
>>  * 513 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=513> - Why
>> do we need Injector.getAllBindings?
>>    Status: Rationale for why it's useful in the comments, awaiting
>> replies.
>>
>>  * 514 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=514> - Do
>> we need Injector.getExistingBinding()?
>>    Status: Rationale for why it's useful (but not strictly necessary) in
>> the comments, awaiting replies.
>>
>>  * 515 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=515> -
>> What are the use cases for @Toolable?
>>    Status: Use cases listed in the comments, awaiting replies.
>>
>>  * 516 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=516> -
>> Investigate duplicate binding filtering
>>    Status: Performance implications & rationale explained in comments,
>> awaiting replies.
>>
>>  * 517 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=517> - Fix
>> classloader leak
>>    Status: More questions asked in the comments, awaiting answers.
>>
>>  * 518 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=518> -
>> Hide Key.ofType()
>>    Status: Question opened, no replies.  Awaiting comments.
>>
>>  * 519 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=519> -
>> toProvider() should use Guice's Provider, not JSR-330
>>    Status: Lots of discussion in comments, no resolution.
>>
>>  * Cleanup new guice-persist extension.
>>    Status: Some code review changes applied... is it stable?
>>
>>  * maven2 POM?
>>    Status: I don't know?
>>
>>  * Include guice-grapher extension in release
>>    Status: Open question, awaiting comments.
>>
>> Closed issues:
>>  * Undeprecate Guice.createInjector.  [DONE, 
>> r1180<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1180>
>> ]
>>  * Fix servlet extension to allow multiple modules/filters/injectors in
>> one JVM. [DONE, 
>> r1187<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1187>
>> ]
>>  * Add "@since 3.0" to new APIs.  [DONE,  
>> r1183<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1183>
>> ]
>>  * Remove ScopeChecker [DONE, 
>> r1179<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1179>
>> ]
>>  * Refactor internal package (move utility class to .internal.util) [DONE,
>> r1185 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1185>]
>>  * Fix overridden @Inject method behavior [DONE, 
>> r1177<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1177>
>> ]
>>  * JIT providers / autobinders [SHELVED]
>>
>> sam
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "google-guice-dev" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "google-guice-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to